![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Thursday, June 11, 2009 at 2:45:37 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote:
OK Anyone out there with experience in converting the T59D / 401 Kestrel canopy from the awful removable thing with a hoop exactly where you want to watch the tug, to a single piece. Apparently there is an approved mod using a DG200 canopy. Second question is - would there be anyone with such a canopy /frame assembly for sale. As I understand it you need the entire DG hinge and pedestal part too. FWIW - I am considering modifying a Mark 2 Slingsby T59D Kestrel 19m - though to the best of my knowledge the canopy and cockpit is identical on the various Kestrels. Any advice gladly received. Cheers Bruce Further to my earlier comments on desirable mods., I just remembered an important one. As received new from the factory, 1972, I discovered that despite the vne of 145 kts ( from memory); at sowewhere around 90 kts, a kick on the pedals would instigate rudder flutter, quite disturbing but killed by pressure on both pedals. AS in yugoslavia in 1972 , we never got to fly near Vb, let alone vne, this was not a concern. However, when I was repairing this glider 4 years later, I discovered a reason for this flutter. Normal composite fuselage construction uses plies at 45 deg to the axis which yields the maximum torsional stiffness for the laminate. My fuselage as laid up by the gnomes of Kirbymoorside, had plies running parallel to the axis, ie 1.4 x less torsionaly less stiff. (the first rudder flutter mode is torsional) Moreover, the mass balance on the rudder was at the bottom , the wrong place for torsional mass balance; it should be near the top. Nothing I could do about the layup, but moving and adding to the mass balance near the top of the rudder moved the flutter propensity above 110kts, unlikely in a proper final glide. These faults may have been corrected for later serial #s but I suggest flutter testing in small increments above 85 kts. John Firth Ottawa. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kestrel 17 Polar | Jim Archer | Soaring | 1 | November 24th 08 05:33 PM |
| Kestrel 19 Questions | [email protected] | Soaring | 13 | October 30th 08 05:26 PM |
| Wanted. DG200 or DG 400 17M tips extensions. | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 7th 07 06:39 AM |
| Epic vs Kestrel | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 0 | August 3rd 06 04:19 AM |
| Slingsby Kestrel 19m | Grant Johnson | Soaring | 1 | July 27th 06 07:14 AM |