![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
|
You seriously need to understand the max weight of the none lifting parts, you can’t use the weight available as water ballast in the wings in your calculations, as being in the wings it does not
increase the bending loads of the spar, and you will be overloading the lift pins on the fuselage. The suggestion to put extra weight in the wings by fitting extra ballast capacity is also a very dangerous concept as you will he increasing the negative g loads which are only half the positive g rating. The max weight is there for a reason. Otherwise, it’s a good plan. Bringing the profile to accurate form is your best way to improve performance by far, as Slingsby did a very poor job of profile accuracy. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Kestrel 17 Polar | Jim Archer | Soaring | 1 | November 24th 08 05:33 PM |
| Kestrel 19 Questions | [email protected] | Soaring | 13 | October 30th 08 05:26 PM |
| Wanted. DG200 or DG 400 17M tips extensions. | [email protected] | Soaring | 0 | November 7th 07 06:39 AM |
| Epic vs Kestrel | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 0 | August 3rd 06 04:19 AM |
| Slingsby Kestrel 19m | Grant Johnson | Soaring | 1 | July 27th 06 07:14 AM |