![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Snip
Launching things like seaplanes, which were present at Pearl, would be useless and suicidal. Fighters from ENTERPRISE did arrive over Pearl in the course of the attack. -- Andrew Toppan --- --- "I speak only for myself" "Haze Gray & Underway" - Naval History, DANFS, World Navies Today, Photo Features, Military FAQs, and more - http://www.hazegray.org/ Of course, if the relatively limited seaplane patrol assets had been used for long range search, there was the possibility the attack force might have been detected prior (perhaps well prior) to launch. As there were insufficient aircraft to provide a truly effective search (perhaps 180 degree hemisphere to the west of Oahu), it was decided to not search at all. The short and long term impacts of an early warning at Pearl are interesting to ponder. There are a number of scenarios in which the outcome for the US could have been far worse. R / John |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Remember Pearl Harbor: Special Program Tonight at EAA | Fitzair4 | Home Built | 0 | December 7th 04 08:40 PM |
| Pearl Harbor Defense | Dave | Military Aviation | 157 | September 27th 04 01:43 AM |
| For Keith Willshaw... | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 253 | July 6th 04 06:18 AM |