![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'd go with a very stripped-down version of the A-6, maybe even something
like the proposal Grumman made for a light attack variant back when the Thalidomide Crusader (A-7) was chosen for the role. (Grumman proposed a single-seat two-engine bird that otherwise had all the other classic A-6 characteristics. If folks thought the two-place A-6 looked strange, this single-place "thing" was strange-squared. I believe someone in r.a.m.n. posted a link to an illustration of this bird recently - if so, could we please see a repost?) Like Woody I agree it should be a JDAM dump truck. In addition, it should be an outstanding tanker. Unlike Woody, I'd dispense with a nice avionics suite in favor of "just enough" to do the mission and get back to Mother. With more and more of the smarts now in the weapon, vice the carriage, this puppy might even be a (gasp!) UAV. In other words, a bird with the simplicity of the early A-4s and the deep strike / fuel-hauling / gas passing capability of the A-6. Unfortunately however, no role in such a bird for an old, broke-dick A-6A B/N like me. Owl sends. -- Mike Kanze "Dear Abby: My cousin has been paying a psychiatrist $50 an hour, every week for two and a half years. He must be crazy." - "Dear Abby" letters that never saw print "Jim" wrote in message ... This time of the year I usually ask the regular readers of this newsgroup which aircraft they flew years ago they'd most like to see with a newer engine. Always worthy of many fine comments. This time a slight revision. You are recalled to active duty for combat overseas. You will return with a version of the model you formerly flew. But this time you can change one aspect only. Which airframe and what would that be? Keep in mind this could mean your F-4J against a MiG-29 or SU-30? Avionics? Engine? FCS? *********************************************** ACC USN ret. NKX, BIKF, NAB, CV-63, NIR 67-69 69-71 71-74 77-80 80-85 & 74-77 Co-founder of newsgroup - RAMN Anti-spam measures in action. For e-mail response delete "nospam" *********************************************** |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wanted: copy of Flying Buyers' Guide 1983 or older | Ren? | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | January 14th 05 07:06 AM |
| Story of an older pilot 74 | Hankal | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | November 3rd 04 04:52 AM |
| Canadian Forces cast about for used Hercules airframes | Andrew Chaplin | Military Aviation | 24 | October 3rd 03 03:24 AM |
| #1 Jet of World War II | Christopher | Military Aviation | 203 | September 1st 03 04:04 AM |
| Long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 20 | August 27th 03 10:14 AM |