![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Tamas- Otherwise all variable wing planes suck a great deal: heavy,
trouble-prone, cost a lot to maintain, wings mecha takes up precious place in the fuselage, won't survive battle damage. No wonder the USN is retiring all Tomcats. BRBR It wasn't the swept wing that doomed the F-14. In my experience in 2 F-14 squadrons, the wing sweep mechanism was never a maintenance issue. It's pretty much bulletproof, too, being overbuilt and armored. Wing sweep problems are really rare. The folks at Pax tested the one wing stuck aft flyability and landability (I don't remember whether they tested trappability, though), I think as the result of that actually happening once. That was fairly recently, like in the last decade, so it's probably related to system wear. The wing sweep actuators ran on separate hyd systems but were interconnected via a torque tube so that loss of one PC would not inhibit wing operation. Problem was the torque tube was designed for emergency use, not every day. Standard maint procedures would use only one hyd to power the system and sweep the wings with the tube. Eventually one failed in flight and the aircraft trapped aboard America in the IO with one at 20 degrees one at 35 (mid 80's, the cruise after I left VF-102). It was relatively easy to control and except for higher approach speed (maneuvering flaps/slats only) not that big a deal. R / John |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|