A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

747 engine takeoff power



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4  
Old November 26th 04, 11:30 PM
Gord Beaman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bob Moore wrote:

Gord Beaman wrote

I've never heard of this. Any a/c that I'm familiar with
certainly don't modulate takeoff power according to their weight.


It can be done for most all jet transport category aircraft.
It is called the "reduced takeoff thrust" procedure. Most
airlines have FAA approval to use this procedure in order
to extend engine life. It's all about "creep units", RPM,
and EGT or TIT. Keep the RMP and EGT as low as possible for
extended engine life.
It goes something like this......
From the runway takeoff limit chart, determine the maximum
allowable temperature for the actual weight. Then use that
assumed temperature to determine the takeoff power setting.
This will produce takeoff performance equal to a takeoff at
maximum weight for the actual temperature.
I'll scan the procedure out of my Boeing manual if this is
not clear enough.

Bob Moore
VP-21 VP-46
ATP B-707 B-727
PanAm (retired)


Thanks Bob, and that's quite clear, no need to scan it at all. I
just had never heard of it being done before. Seems like a
somewhat unsafe thing to be doing with a high value machine in a
highly critical phase of its flight.

Perhaps 'unsafe' isn't the correct word here, my point is that I
feel that it might be unproductive to operate the a/c closer to
it's maximum capabilities just to save some 'wear and tear' on
the engines? I'd think that you're not availing yourself of that
'extra performance' in case of an engine failure at a critical
time. I suspect that it'd take a hell of a long time to make up
what they lost in that one crash. (not even to mention the seven
crew-members)
--

-Gord.
(use gordon in email)
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dennis Fetters Mini 500 EmailMe Home Built 70 June 21st 04 10:36 PM
Proposals for air breathing hypersonic craft. I Robert Clark Military Aviation 2 May 26th 04 07:42 PM
What if the germans... Charles Gray Military Aviation 119 January 27th 04 12:20 AM
#1 Jet of World War II Christopher Military Aviation 203 September 1st 03 04:04 AM
Aircraft engine certification FAR's Corky Scott Home Built 4 July 25th 03 07:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.