A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Naval Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Squall torpedo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old December 2nd 04, 01:04 AM
Keith Willshaw
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eunometic" wrote in message
m...
"Keith Willshaw" wrote in message
...
"Spitfiremk9" wrote in message
...
Whoops there goes another Super Carrier (steering gear & screws) !

http://www.diodon349.com/Kursk-Memor...the_squall.htm


Stop being silly

The Skhval is a short range straight runner that does NOT
home in on the steering gear or screws. The Russian
torpedo that IS dangerous in this respect is the large
Type 53-65 passive wake homing torpedo,

Keith


I doubt the Russians would produce a completely impracticable weapon.


Its a Hail Mary Weapon intended to be fired at a vessel that has
a lock on you and is about to kill you. At best it might actually hit
the enemy but there's a good chance it'll evade and in doing so
break the lock.


Almost certainly a modest degree of directional control (perhaps turn
rates of 1 degree per second) is possible if only to keep the missile
on course, homing guidence at full speed might be difficult due to
the gas cavity and rocket motor interfering with both passive and
active sonar but that wouldn't prevent the missile being equiped with
an inertial guidence system able to take the missile to within close
range of the target where it either slows down for a 'look' using
conventional passive or active sonar or it detonates a large (possibly
nuclear) warhead. Even a cheap inertial guidence system would have
drift rates of at most 20 meters per minute; given its speed of well
over 300km/h or 5km/minute so an attack on targets 25 km away would
place the missile within 100 meters of the 'enemy carrier' or 'sub'.


Trouble is we know the weapon has no sucuh guidance system
and that its range is nothing like 25 km. Russia began marketing
the conventionally armed version of the Shkval at the IDEX 99
exhibition in Abu Dhabi in early 1999. The firisng system
sets the speed, distance and vector and feeds the data to the
missile's automatic pilot. The missile is fired, achieves its
optimum depth and switches on its engines. The missile
does not have a homing warhead

Even attacks using WW2 shoot and forget collision course type aiming
with spreads of torpedos would have a high degree of success given the
enormous speed of the missile preventing evasive manouvers.


If it were not for the fact that its range is less than 8000 yards

Keith


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How exactly will Taiwan torpedo the dam? Henry J Cobb Military Aviation 49 June 24th 04 06:07 PM
PING: Gordon (was: The torpedo high jump...) Yeff Military Aviation 0 June 10th 04 09:41 AM
Mk46 Torpedo Fin CJ Military Aviation 4 July 22nd 03 06:59 AM
Mk46 Torpedo CJ Naval Aviation 1 July 22nd 03 06:58 AM
USS Liberty. MTB crewman has credibility. Steve Richter Naval Aviation 2 July 19th 03 07:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2026 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.