![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Airlines that use 737's on trans-Atlantic routes may benefit from the
7E7 as a replacement if load factors increase. But the vast majority of 737's live in a high cycle, short flight environment. Not something touted as a big selling point of the 7E7. -j- On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 06:21:33 +0100, Pooh Bear wrote: Kevin Brooks wrote: The 7E7-3 will doubtless replace even 737's (and their Airbus equivalents) on some routes that can use the greater capacity. " that can use the greater capacity " is IMHO the ctical factor. If you don't need the capacity ( or its range ) - you don't need 7E7 - period. Do you *really* see 7E7s replacing 737s ? Sounds bonkers to me. Totally different operating scenarios. Graham |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| want to trade 601 plans for 701 plans | [email protected] | Home Built | 0 | January 27th 05 08:50 PM |
| Unused plans question | Doc Font | Home Built | 0 | December 8th 04 10:16 PM |
| What are Boeing's plans? | David Lednicer | General Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 10:19 PM |
| What are Boeing's plans? | David Lednicer | Military Aviation | 62 | September 27th 04 01:23 AM |
| Modifying Vision plans for retractable gear... | Chris | Home Built | 1 | February 27th 04 10:23 PM |