A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Ownership and passengers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13  
Old October 9th 03, 01:54 AM
MRQB
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

as a student pilot who busts you and who questions you how do they find out
ect.



"John Harper" wrote in message
news:1065653712.292352@sj-nntpcache-5...
But there's also the question of what constitutes compensation. I remember
reading
about a case where someone was busted because even though they didn't take
any money, the passenger was an established customer of their business and
it
was argued that the compensation was expectation of future business.

Suppose
I fly my boss somewhere, it could be argued that the compensation is
expectation
of a pay-rise (fat chance) or other job-related benefits

John

"John Galban" wrote in message
om...
"Roger Long" om wrote

in message . ..
The FAA is looking for two things when considering the question of

whether a
private pilot was carrying a passenger(s) legitimately. One is

evidence
that the passenger is incidentally aboard on a flight that was going

to
take
place anyway. Second is that the pilot and passenger have a shared

interest
in the objective of the flight.


Disagree. The above would be true if limited to flights where some
form of compensation (like cost sharing) was involved. Commonality of
purporse only comes into effect in determining whether the
compensation was allowed under the rules. No compensation, no
question.


In the case of co-ownership, such as in a partnership or flying club

(with
stock), would there not be a presumption of shared interest?

For example:

Strictly speaking, if a friend not involved with your aircraft said.

"I
need
to go to Podunk on Saturday, how about flying me up there?", the

flight
would be questionable if you had no prior intent or independent reason

to
fly there.


Only if you were compensated by the friend. If you paid all costs
associated with the flight, it's perfectly legal.
snip

Anyone care to predict what the FAA would (or should) say? Assume

costs
shared properly according to seat occupancy.


Are we assuming this in all examples? If so, forget what I said
above.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)





 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.