|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
November 15th 03, 06:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:00:27 -0500
"G.R. Patterson III" wrote: "R. Hubbell" wrote: On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 14:45:11 -0800 Jeff wrote: losing 1 of 2 is better then losing 1 of 1 .. ka-boom Not for my wallet. You don't have to pay for the hospital or funeral expenses? Losing one of two or one of one is the same to my wallet. Regarding the funeral expenses no I wouldn't have to pay those. ;-) Regarding the hospital expenses, if that happened I'd probably not be worried about the expenses but gald to be included in the living. That assumes that losing an engine means I crash. I be engine outs are low on the crash totem pole. R. Hubbell George Patterson If you're not part of the solution, you can make a lot of money prolonging the problem. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Threaded Mode