![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
O. Sami Saydjari wrote:
: OK. I have a basic question. Why is running an engine at peak : temperature (as in Rich-of-Peak operation) not good for the engine? In : the scheme of things 50-100 degress cooler than peak temperature (where : many folks recommend the engine be run) does not seem significantly : lower in temperature than the peak temperature. It would seem if the : engine parts can stand Peak-100 degrees, they would be able to stand : peak. What am I missing? (Oh, and I have read Deakin's articles on : AVWEB, and still have this question). Sami, I think that Deakin is using TEMPERATURE, which can be determined by cockpit instrumentation to describe TIME, which cannot be seen on cockpit instruments. When running 50-100 ROP, the temperatures are well controlled. The difficulty as I understand it is because the power pulse from the piston occurs very shortly after the piston reached Top Dead Center (TDC). What this means is that the force of the piston is being transferred to the crankshaft at a very small angle - this can be demonstrated by holding your arm out, elbow straight, and pushing on the wall: you can't make your elbow bend. If you bend your elbow a little bit, and then push the wall, it is quite easy to bend your elbow more. (In my example, your elbow represents the connecting rod/crankshaft, and your hand the piston). Running at LOP values, or very rich values, slows down the buring of the gases above the piston, resulting in the push force being delivered when the crankshaft has turned a couple more degrees (Deakin claims that 16 degrees after TDC is optimum). This is easier for the engine to take, the bearings are exposed to lower forces, etc. The use of TEMPERATURE to determine TIME (crankshaft angle) is because there is no instrument to determine crankshaft angle vs. combustion event timing. Please note that this is a significant difference from auto engines! Car engines have adjustable spark timing to overcome these difficulties, while airplane magneto engines almost always have fixed timing (there is an adjustable timing system for airplane engines). I am not sure that I explained this as well as it is possible to do so, but the basic point that I am trying to make is that the TEMPERATURE is not in itself the critical issue, so long as you don't melt the cylinder heads. Rather, TEMPERATURE is used to indirectly indicate another, immesurable, parameter, crankshaft angle vs. combustion event timing. -- Aaron Coolidge (N9376J) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|