A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

S-TEC 60-2 requires re-trim after altitude hold?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5  
Old March 2nd 04, 12:19 AM
Roger Halstead
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:07:19 -0500, Peter R.
wrote:

Speaking of the S-Tec 60-2, I am transitioning to a Bonanza V35B that is
equipped with this AP. The previous owner demonstrated an idiosyncrasy
with the AP that I would like to correct, if possible.


I don't think you are going to find any thing wrong with the AP.
OTOH my experience is limited to only a couple of planes and mine has
an S-Tec 50 with altitude hold.

Using the AP to hold VSI, the aircraft is in a climb. Upon reaching the
assigned altitude, I push the ALT button on the AP. The aircraft, since it
overshot the altitude by 100 feet or so, descends and levels off at the
altitude where I engaged the ALT hold, then begins a speed increase to
cruise speed.


Is the speed exactly the same as it was prior to the climb, or is the
power setting the same?

If you have climbed and the bo is going faster it will require the
trim be reset.


Now for the idiosyncrasy: The AP is engaged and the aircraft is holding
perfectly at the desired altitude. However, if I disengage the AP, the
aircraft immediately begins a climb, suggesting that there is a slight
nose-up trim situation that was being held back by the AP.

To overcome this, the previous owner suggested that after level-off,
disengage the AP, manually re-trim, then re-engage the AP.


The Bo is very sensitive to trim and speed. slight differences are
going to require retrimming. The AP will correct the situation, but
when disconnected the trim will go back to its manual setting
resulting in a climb or descent. If very far out of trim the change
can be rather abrupt.


How can the S-TEC AP be adjusted to hold the altitude after a climb without
the nose-up trim problem? It seems to me that, over time, this problem
could result in premature wear and tear of the AP control servos, no?


As the AP is continually adjusting the trim, it's unlikely it would
add any wear due to the out-of-trim situation.
Get into some turbulence and that sucker can change so fast it'll do a
better job of holding altitude that I can. OTOH that's when I turn it
off to reduce stresses.

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Report Leaving Assigned Altitude? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 81 March 20th 04 03:34 PM
Hold "as published"? John Clonts Instrument Flight Rules 83 November 13th 03 04:19 PM
GPS Altitude with WAAS Phil Verghese Instrument Flight Rules 42 October 5th 03 01:39 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 04:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.