![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
A grand or so? Borescoping is now considered a standard part of the
compression check for Continental engines, and I do it regularly on every annual. Borescoping involves little more than pulling a spark plug out of each cylinder, and shouldn't cost any $1000 or so! Unless you have a piston disintegrating, borescoping won't tell you much in your case, either. Robert M. Gary wrote: I've had slightly high aluminum for the last year. I'm not happy about it but everyone says its not high enough to spend real money pulling cylinders or boroscoping. I'm curious what the group thinks... IO-360-A3B6 SFNEW 682 At each 50 hours change I've had... 7, 10, 25, 13 (short sample), 24, 23 ppm I don't think I have an alumimum dip stick (at least my A&P says I don't). I'm not finding anything in the filter. I'm in California so everything is pretty pricey. Should I spend a grand or so having the cylinders boroscoped? -Robert |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 08:28 PM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 1 | November 24th 03 03:46 PM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 2 | November 24th 03 06:23 AM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 24th 03 04:52 AM |
| Aluminum vs Fiberglass landing gear - Pro's and cons. | Bart D. Hull | Home Built | 0 | November 22nd 03 07:24 AM |