![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Marty from Sunny Florida" wrote in message ... From what I've read on this NG, the Lycoming engine is a better choice in terms of hours to Major Overhaul. A Continental engine with Millenium cylinders makes the engine less likely to fail. All things equal, including the price, what is considered a better buy, the 150 or 152? Presume they're one model year apart and equally equipped. Advice and opinions, please. Marty For the same money? 152, of course. That 115 HP Lycoming has a lot of oomph by comparison. 150's are underpowered. Still a great machine, though, if you weigh 150 and she weighs 100. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1/72 Cessna 300, 400 series scale models | Ale | Owning | 3 | October 22nd 13 04:40 PM |
| Cessna buyers in So. Cal. beware ! | Bill Berle | Home Built | 73 | June 25th 04 05:53 AM |
| FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Aviation Marketplace | 1 | November 4th 03 01:57 AM |
| FORSALE: HARD TO FIND CESSNA PARTS! | Enea Grande | Owning | 1 | November 4th 03 01:57 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |