![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... And it looks like the small jets are pushing the turbo props and the twin piston engines. Is it a matter of time before it will be cheaper to just buy a small jet? I'm not holding my breath on that one. Me either. But if you believe the manufacturer's claims, it is just a matter of time. Several of the "mini jet" designs under development are cheaper than the existing turboprop models, single or twin, and cost about the same as new piston twins. Of course, you can't actually buy any of them right now, and it remains to be seen what they will actually cost if and when they make it to market. What puzzles me is why there doesn't appear to be anyone working on turbines in the range of 160 to 250 HP for aircraft. Small turbines are inherently inefficient so you are unlikely to see them in this power range. The fuel consumption might be double that of a diesel. Mike MU-2 GA Flyer just included an "engines in development" article as part of their Oshkosh coverage, and had a picture of exactly that, as well as a mention in the article of the company producing the small turbines (I think they said all for turboprop installations). They are out there...you just need to look. Don't get distracted by the lack of certificated engines, or lack of interest in certification. Not all of the engine research and development going on is aimed at the certificated market. Pete |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|