A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Cyclone fuel saver??



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #8  
Old September 22nd 04, 02:38 PM
Michelle P
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave,
I suspect you have a carburated engine? I suspect it would have little
effect in a multi-point fuel injected engine.
Michelle

wrote:

Race car people dimple the inards of the intake manifold to make the
air a little bit more turbulent to help mix the gasses.
During cruise, i keep the throttle off the stops and my egt's smooth out.
I suspect for the same reason.

Dave

Dave S wrote:

So.. by adding a restriction to flow (in the form of some cute gizmo)
you are intending to INCREASE horsepower?

I recall hearing in another discussion group I participate in, that
one of these devices came apart from the suction forces in the
engine.. not what you want happening..

Dave

Gary wrote:

Just got home from work and at this time in the morning the only
thing on TV
is infomercials

So here I am watching these infomercials and on comes the one for the
Cyclone Fuel Saver. Now they claim that it improves fuel mileage and
power
output from the engine. So I was just wondering if anyone has tried
this
little device in their piston aircraft?
The theory makes sense, spinning air in the intake tract to help mix
the
air/fuel better before entering the cylinder. Now the ad says that this
works in any gasoline burning engine (and they list almost every gas
burning
engine ever invented) except the ad didn't mention aircraft. I find
this
interesting cause if it works really that good in cars, trucks,
motorcycles
ect. ect wouldn't it work just as well in a airplane?

I assume that this device hasn't been approved for use in piston powerd
aircraft yet or, maybe it just isn't as good as the makers claim!




--

Michelle P ATP-ASEL, CP-AMEL, and AMT-A&P

"Elisabeth" a Maule M-7-235B (no two are alike)

Volunteer Pilot, Angel Flight Mid-Atlantic

Volunteer Builder, Habitat for Humanity

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
spaceship one Pianome Home Built 169 June 30th 04 06:47 AM
Repairing Plastic Instrument Panel Overlay Jeff P Owning 22 January 29th 04 07:42 PM
Yo! Fuel Tank! Veeduber Home Built 15 October 25th 03 03:57 AM
Pumping fuel backwards through an electric fuel pump Greg Reid Home Built 15 October 7th 03 08:09 PM
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) The Revolution Will Not Be Televised Military Aviation 161 September 25th 03 08:35 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.