A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

25 is magic number



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6  
Old February 11th 04, 07:17 PM
Corky Scott
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

rlier, tongaloa wrote:

mission requirements
250 kt cruise
2500 kt range
250 lb (pilot and 'stuff')
25,000 ft cruise altitude


The 2500 mile range is likely doable, after all, Lindbergh managed it
with 1927 technology. What he did was take an airplane and modify it
so that it was a flying gas tank. That required a number of
modifications to the original airframe to beef it up so it would hold
that much gas and not collaps when landing or clap the wings in
turbulence. He also had a gas tank in front of him such that it
totally blocked any view straight ahead. He compensated for that but
hanging his head out the open window. Not something I'd recommend at
25,000 feet. You've heard of the Voyager, Dick Rutan and Jeanna
Yeager flew it around the world with what they carried internally for
gas. That was a one off type airplane, and Burt Rutan has designed
another to duplicate the feat, this time jet powered and it will fly a
lot higher and faster than the Voyager.

The 25000 mile cruise altitude is of course obtainable, you just need
to size the wings accordingly and supercharge the engine somehow.
It's not new, it's done all the time by certified airframe
manufacturers. You'll need full time oxygen at that altitude, and a
lot of it if you are traveling 2,500 miles.

The big problem to me is the 250 kt cruise speed. There aren't many
singles that can manage that, those that do are running a pretty big
or they aren't big or both. Pretty big engines pulling an airplane
along at 250 kts don't get great milage, but perhaps that can be
compensated for by putting in enough fuel tanks. But then the wings
get larger and cost more drag and you have to beef up the airframe in
order to be safe and now you need more power to pull it through the
air. Tis a dilemma.

You are probably talking about a one-off type airplane. Maybe you
should speak with Mr. Rutan.

Corky Scott
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pitts Number 1 registration number Mirco Aerobatics 3 December 4th 04 12:50 PM
TrueType N number Font? Errol Groff Home Built 3 November 21st 03 02:43 PM
Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 41 November 20th 03 06:39 AM
ZZZooommm rant latest Kyle Boatright Home Built 181 September 19th 03 04:30 AM
Phone number for Dillsberg? Robert Bonomi Home Built 2 September 10th 03 12:17 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.