![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
rlier, tongaloa wrote:
mission requirements 250 kt cruise 2500 kt range 250 lb (pilot and 'stuff') 25,000 ft cruise altitude The 2500 mile range is likely doable, after all, Lindbergh managed it with 1927 technology. What he did was take an airplane and modify it so that it was a flying gas tank. That required a number of modifications to the original airframe to beef it up so it would hold that much gas and not collaps when landing or clap the wings in turbulence. He also had a gas tank in front of him such that it totally blocked any view straight ahead. He compensated for that but hanging his head out the open window. Not something I'd recommend at 25,000 feet. You've heard of the Voyager, Dick Rutan and Jeanna Yeager flew it around the world with what they carried internally for gas. That was a one off type airplane, and Burt Rutan has designed another to duplicate the feat, this time jet powered and it will fly a lot higher and faster than the Voyager. The 25000 mile cruise altitude is of course obtainable, you just need to size the wings accordingly and supercharge the engine somehow. It's not new, it's done all the time by certified airframe manufacturers. You'll need full time oxygen at that altitude, and a lot of it if you are traveling 2,500 miles. The big problem to me is the 250 kt cruise speed. There aren't many singles that can manage that, those that do are running a pretty big or they aren't big or both. Pretty big engines pulling an airplane along at 250 kts don't get great milage, but perhaps that can be compensated for by putting in enough fuel tanks. But then the wings get larger and cost more drag and you have to beef up the airframe in order to be safe and now you need more power to pull it through the air. Tis a dilemma. You are probably talking about a one-off type airplane. Maybe you should speak with Mr. Rutan. Corky Scott |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pitts Number 1 registration number | Mirco | Aerobatics | 3 | December 4th 04 12:50 PM |
| TrueType N number Font? | Errol Groff | Home Built | 3 | November 21st 03 02:43 PM |
| Single-Seat Accident Records (Was BD-5B) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 41 | November 20th 03 06:39 AM |
| ZZZooommm rant latest | Kyle Boatright | Home Built | 181 | September 19th 03 04:30 AM |
| Phone number for Dillsberg? | Robert Bonomi | Home Built | 2 | September 10th 03 12:17 AM |