![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
psyshrike wrote:
How does FAA type certification relate to intellectual property rights? For example: everything in an O-235 has been out of patent for years now. Same with old aircraft designs. Is there any reason why somebody couldn't tool up and start ripping out O-235s, and selling them new? It doesn't relate to the intellectual property rights, really. There's nothing that keeps you from type certiciating a device you don't own the rights to. What the certification does is show that you have demonstrated via tests and a preponderance of paperwork that your engine meets the FAA requirements and your ancillary stuff: manufacturing, service tracking, etc... is up to snuff. Someone could start making 235 clones, but they couldn't use Lycoming's certification to do it. The "proof" of the design is only one part of the manufacturer's certification, they need to continually meet the other regulatory standards as well. Does the FAA type certification trump the USPTO when it comes to patent law? It doesn't have any affect on patent law, nor does patent law affect the FAA type certification. Both patent law and certification are in force independently and simoultaneously. You must have complied with any patent requirements for the invention as WELL as gaining FAA certs and approval for selling aircraft parts. I'm not knocking the FAA's safety interests. But public domain is public domain. If I can make a 1948 mousetrap and sell it, why not a Continental Engine? You are free to get your clone engine certificated. However, you can't just go out and manufacture airplane parts because they are clones of some approved part. As I said, there is more to the certification and manufacturing authority than just "proof" of the design. If anybody can refer me to documentation on this or the section of law or regulation that pertains to it, I'd be quite appreciative. I can't emagine such a law exists. But I also can't understand why there is so much reinvention of the wheel. Start by reading Part 21. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions List (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 40 | October 3rd 08 04:13 PM |
| Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 03:39 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 04:04 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 3rd 04 12:41 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 04:07 AM |