![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Frank Stutzman ) wrote:
Still pretty pokey for a Bonanza, but not bad considering that every newer Bonanza that was faster was also burning a lot more fuel than my 10 gph. For comparison, my turbo-normalized V35 with the prior engine burned about 15.5 gph at wide open throttle, 75 degrees LOP, at 185 kts TAS up around 13,000 ft cruise (standard temperature or warmer). This works out to approximately 50% more fuel burned for only about 48% more airspeed (assuming the 125 kts quoted in your post). I am curious if the new engine will add a few kts more since all tolerances will be factory new or better (how's that for regurgitating the marketing literature?). -- Peter |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Opinions on Cessna 340, 414 and 421 | john szpara | Owning | 55 | April 2nd 04 10:08 PM |
| Thanks for your opinions - Going to pick up plane tomorrow!! | Larryskydives | Owning | 0 | February 13th 04 05:44 AM |
| OPINIONS: THE SOLUTION | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | January 7th 04 11:43 PM |
| Rallye/Koliber AD's and opinions | R. Wubben | Owning | 2 | October 16th 03 06:39 AM |
| Early Bonanza or Apache? | Brinks | Owning | 11 | July 16th 03 07:01 PM |