![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert Moore" wrote in message
. 7... But I think that the discussion was weathervaning into the actual wind, not the relative wind. That's not how I read it. Alex was asking about flight on final approach in a crosswind. In that situation, aileron by itself to maintain groundtrack along the extended centerline will definitely cause the relative wind to not be aligned with the longitudinal axis. That lack of alignment then results in imbalanced forces on the vertical stabilizer, which then results in weathervaning. If I bank away from the wind, does the airplane then weathervane into or away from the wind? Away from the the Earth-relative wind, but into the airplane-relative wind. The only thing that can cause the airplane to weathervane into the actual wind is for the wheels to be in contact with the ground. If you mean "the only thing that can cause the airplane to weathervane into the actual wind without any other control inputs", then yes...I'd have to agree with that. I don't think that's the question originally posed though. (Nitpicking ![]() Without the qualification I mention, banking into the actual wind causes a slip in the direction of the actual wind, which causes the relative wind to come from the same direction as the actual wind, which would cause weathervaning into the actual wind. Without enough aileron input, the plane wouldn't actually weathervane all the way around to align the longitudinal axis with the actual wind, but the airplane certainly would have weathervaned toward that direction. It's all about your frame of reference and your other assumptions. Lacking the necessary assumptions, one is free to imagine situations where the statement is not true. (End nitpicking) Without the pivot, a weathervane doesn't weathervane. True. However, even when not on the ground, there is a pivot. It just happens to be at the CG rather than the landing gear. Also, the "wind" that's relevant for the question of weathervaning changes from being the wind relative to the Earth, to being the wind relative to the airplane. Pete |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|