A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Weathervaning



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #22  
Old November 11th 03, 04:07 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Robert Moore" wrote in message
. 7...
But I think that the discussion was weathervaning into the
actual wind, not the relative wind.


That's not how I read it. Alex was asking about flight on final approach in
a crosswind. In that situation, aileron by itself to maintain groundtrack
along the extended centerline will definitely cause the relative wind to not
be aligned with the longitudinal axis. That lack of alignment then results
in imbalanced forces on the vertical stabilizer, which then results in
weathervaning.

If I bank away from the
wind, does the airplane then weathervane into or away from
the wind?


Away from the the Earth-relative wind, but into the airplane-relative wind.

The only thing that can cause the airplane to
weathervane into the actual wind is for the wheels to be in
contact with the ground.


If you mean "the only thing that can cause the airplane to weathervane into
the actual wind without any other control inputs", then yes...I'd have to
agree with that. I don't think that's the question originally posed though.

(Nitpicking

Without the qualification I mention, banking into the actual wind causes a
slip in the direction of the actual wind, which causes the relative wind to
come from the same direction as the actual wind, which would cause
weathervaning into the actual wind. Without enough aileron input, the plane
wouldn't actually weathervane all the way around to align the longitudinal
axis with the actual wind, but the airplane certainly would have
weathervaned toward that direction.

It's all about your frame of reference and your other assumptions. Lacking
the necessary assumptions, one is free to imagine situations where the
statement is not true.

(End nitpicking)

Without the pivot, a weathervane doesn't weathervane.


True. However, even when not on the ground, there is a pivot. It just
happens to be at the CG rather than the landing gear. Also, the "wind"
that's relevant for the question of weathervaning changes from being the
wind relative to the Earth, to being the wind relative to the airplane.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.