![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Snowbird wrote:
I find it helpful. It is useful to set up different wind conditions, instrument failures etc but it's most useful to me just for drilling procedures. I use the same mneumonics checklists timer etc as I do when I fly. I still can't land MSFS worth a darn. Whatever sensory cues I use to land, they aren't there in "as real as it gets". On the subject of MSFS takeoffs and landings, I did an interesting experiment a while ago with FS98 and the Cessna 182. My goal was to see how recoverable total engine failures at 50-100' AGL were, depending on the type of departure. I believe the results are reasonably reliable (judging by reading NTSB reports). In summary, the takeoff and climbout at Vx is almost unrecoverable in a sudden engine stoppage below about 100 feet - even with a very quick recovery, you don't have the energy to flare and you smash into the runway. A quick recovery results in survivable crash forces - a delayed recovery of the "magic two seconds" that supposedly is the delay that most people have in reacting to a sudden engine stoppage results in what I would expect to be a fatal or serious injury crash. Going off on a tangent, I'm not so sure that the "two seconds reaction time" is all that accurate for a properly trained pilot - I've had power failures on takeoff, and my recovery action was instant. I had a launch failure whilst taking a winch launch recently in a glider. When winch launching, you are pitched up at about 50 degrees nose up, and any delay in recovery will result in a stall (the recovery is immediately push the stick ALL THE WAY forward until you are in an attitude a bit steeper than normal glide, and wait until the airspeed reaches normal flying speed, then recover to normal glide attitude). When the cable backreleased at around 800 feet, I didn't waste *any* time shoving the stick all the way forward. I've also had cases of a C-85 engine momentarily stopping altogether at 40' AGL on normal climbout due to a stuck valve - my recovery action was immediate and I landed on the remaining runway. In winch launching gliders, cable failures aren't all that uncommon, and all the people I've witnessed suffering launch failures have taken immediate recovery action (good job too, because one I saw recently at a glider club over in the UK was at an altitude that any delay in recovery would have resulted in a probable fatal crash). -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Sim time loggable? | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 12 | December 6th 03 08:47 AM |
| CFI logging instrument time | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | November 11th 03 01:23 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| Israeli Air Force to lose Middle East Air Superiority Capability to the Saudis in the near future | Jack White | Military Aviation | 71 | September 21st 03 03:58 PM |