![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pete,
This is a very complex issue which involves a bunch more variables than the three big ticket ones I'm going to mention (fuel delivery for one). Internal to the engine, crankshaft stresses, bearing loads, and oil scavanging/delivery are the three largest concerns for Aerobatic class engines. The first two are also significantly affected by what prop is being used (low inertia, high inertia), however based upon empirical comparison with other engines which are Acrobatically rated, the DeltaHawk is in pretty good shape on those two fronts (our crank is stronger and we have more bearing area). Oil however is another story, the current Deltahawk's are only designed with oil scavenging occurring in one direction, down. There are separate sump systems for the upright and inverted models and while they work fine in their intended orientation, we have not done significant negative g testing with either configuration. It is our intention to pursue this type of testing in the future, as well as test a configuration of the engine with both sump systems active, however to date we have not. Currently the engine is intended to duplicate the performance of the Normal (+3.8,-1.52) and Utility (+4.4,-1.76) classes (I say mimic, because all the initial engines will be registered on experimental class aircraft and limitations will be set by the builder) and our flight testing thus far has not uncovered any problems with these performance envelopes. Hope that answered your question. Dave Driscoll DeltaHawk LLC Pete Schaefer wrote: OK, cool. I got some questions. The site says the engine is not suitable for aerobatic use. What are the operating limits of the engine, specifically the inverted V-4. Pete "Dave Driscoll" wrote in message ... In addition to being an lurker and occasional poster on RAH, I also happen to be one of the engineers responsible for the DeltaHawk (or the sole reason the engine hasn't been in full production for the last 3 years according to the marketing guy). In any case, as this is one of my few areas of RAH expertise, I'd be happy to answer any questions that people may have regarding the project. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 2 | February 3rd 04 12:41 AM |
| Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | January 18th 04 06:36 PM |
| Diesel Jodel information..........and .........diesel plane groups | Roland M | Home Built | 1 | January 4th 04 05:04 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 10:02 PM |
| Diesel engines for Planes Yahoo Group Jodel Diesel is Isuzu Citroen Peugeot | Roland M | Home Built | 3 | September 13th 03 01:44 AM |