![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article d4RBb.29632$ZE1.26228@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell"
writes: On 10 Dec 2003 19:14:07 GMT ackatyu (Wdtabor) wrote: In article kivBb.29415$ZE1.25509@fed1read04, "R. Hubbell" writes: I think you don't know what some US corporations are doing in other "emerging" countries. Providing a means for them to emerge. I was talking about this emerge from the dictionary: "to rise from an obscure or inferior position or condition" So you assume that they are in an inferior position or condition and that's part of the problem. And you must assume no matter what the corporations to it's progress. But that's unfortunately not true. Inferior is a loaded word. Emerging nations and developed nations trade. They trade what they can do better for what others do better. We raise wheat better and develop technology better, they provide cheap labor better. We can't buy jet engines from or electric generators from emerging nations because they don't sell them. We buy cheap labor from them because that is what, for now, they have to offer. The alternative is to not buy what they have to sell and let them do without our wheat and technology. That isn't helping them. Don -- Wm. Donald (Don) Tabor Jr., DDS PP-ASEL Chesapeake, VA - CPK, PVG |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|