FAR rules on "ground-effect" vehicles?

On 01 Apr 2004 22:57:17 GMT,
(Wright1902Glider) wrote:

Does anyone here know if / what-section-of FAR rules govern the operation of
"ground effect" vehicles? Specifically, how high can a machine fly AGL before
its technically classified as an aircraft and not a hovercraft,
hydroplane-boat, Ecronoplan, etc.? Is there a loophole for a powered airplane
that can't climb to more than 5' AGL?

Second question: If a machine has tricycle gear with nosewheel steering, wings
and 3-axis control, and is solely propelled by thrust from an engine/propeller,
BUT CANNOT FLY, how is it classified? Trike motorcycle?

NOTE: Both of these questions relate to a proposed machine that will weigh
more than 254lbs dry, i.e. not Part 103 legal.

Serious responses please. I'm looking to find and verify a specific FAR rule,
as the correct answer to this question is critical for legal, operational, and
insurance purposes.

It can't fly the FAA doesn't care, however your state and local regs
most likely will. That varies widely from state to state.

In Michigan it could be a nightmare if you operate on land and water
as it'd most likely be considered an all terrain vehicle (ATV)
requiring state stickers if used off your own land AND it would
probably require registering as a water craft if operated on water
AND then there would be operating in and along the edges of the Great
Lakes which requires additional schooling/training for the
operator(s).

Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com


Thanks,
Harry Frey
Wright Brothers Enterprises