![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the 182RG I enter the pattern and slow to 130 knots on downwind then
gear, 10 degrees of flaps, and carb heat all come out 1/2 way down the runway at about 20inches MP, this slows me to 100 knots across from the numbers prop goes all the way in and reduce to 1500 RPMs 20 degrees of flaps on base now gives me 80knots indicated turn final and bring flaps down to 30 degrees hold it to 80 over the fence with touch down at around 65, adding just a touch of power to arrest the sink if I'm heavy I go through C.G.U.M.P.S. on each leg. I rarely use 40 degrees of flaps because of the huge increase in drag with little increase in lift requiring the increase in power you mention, I'd rather fly a stabilized approach on the front side of the power curve than run out of power and altitude both at the same time. Plus having to add full power for a go around with 40 degrees of flaps hanging out provides for an instant lesson in torque, P-factor, and asymmetrical thrust all happening with very little altitude for slow reactions or improper trim settings. For a short field landing I'll use the full 40 degrees of flaps and come in carrying a small amount of extra power but I'll wait to put in that last notch of flaps until on short final. This is a good point to remember your slow flight training. The 182RG will fly at 37knots with gear and full flaps out, but you're going to be very nose high, it requires nearly full power and you'd better be on those rudder pedals. This doesn't leave you much of an "out" when you're close to the ground. If I need to loose altitude, I'd rather slip it down to where I need to be as early as possible rather than throwing in all the flaps and chopping the power. If you find yourself high after you're stabilized, then you slip to loose the unwanted altitude once you take out the slip the airplane returns to it's original stabilized decent. If I'm dealing with a heavy crosswind component, I'll generally limit my flaps to 20 degrees and keep the speed up. The 182 will let you do a lot with it as far as landings go. I think the most memorable landing I made with it was when advised by tower to keep my pattern tight and landing short I was able to put in 40 degrees of flaps on base, cut it to an 1/8 mile final slipping all the way down to 200 ft land on the numbers and make the first taxi way. Inbound traffic had to ask the tower where I had disappeared to. Ok, now that I've opened up the whole slipping with flaps debate, read and follow your POH, nothing in the 182RG's prohibiting it nor recommending against it. That's just the way I generally do it, or attempt to do it. YMMV. -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 04:54 AM |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 06:03 AM |
| Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 05:03 PM |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 12:13 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |