![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am a CFII and I own a C-182Q (fixed gear). I teach, and fly, as follows:
1) slow and trim to 90 knots abeam the numbers (about 15 inches/prop forward). 2) 1 "notch" of flaps will slow you to 80 with little, if any, trimming. 3) Turning base and adding another "notch" will slow you to 70 knots, again, with little, if any, trimming. 4) Turn final and add the 3rd "notch" to slow you to 60-65 knots...again, will little, if any trimming. The book says "normal approach" is 60-70 KIAS, so this works quite well....consistently. Of course, you will be gradually throttling back and making small trim corrections (if necessary). I stress CONSISTENCY. Do the same thing, the same way, EVERY TIME (making minor corrections/adjustments as necessary for wind, turbulence, etc.) and you'll likely get consistently good landings. Here's a tip: Add just a teensy bit of power on the round out to help raise that heavy 182 nose and you'll grease it on. PB following this procedure"Tom Fleischman" wrote in message rthlink.net... In article , III wrote: I know this question pertains to aircraft and piloting in general, but I'm wondering what C-182 pilots do. I'm sold on the benefits of a stabilized approach. I consider a stabilized approach to mean that power, flaps, and trim are set right after turning final (assuming a standard pattern) and then aren't adjusted until starting the roundout and flare. I like to land with the flaps fully extended. If I turn final in a Skylane and extend the flaps to 40 degrees, it takes a lot of power to make it to the threshold (given a 1/2 mile final, which is not unheard of at our busy airport), so a stabilized approach requires a lot of power to drag the plane in. I've taken to turning final with two notches of flaps out, leaving the power at about 1700 RPM, and then adding more flaps as needed to follow a path to the threshold and finally adding the remaining flaps on very-short final. That's not a stabilized approach. It works, but I know I could be doing better. I could stabilize the approach using two notches of flaps, but I'd rather use them all. I could use all the flaps on the entire trip down final, but I'd rather not drag the plane along. My CFI uses incremental flaps, my partner advises using two notches and then maybe kicking them all in at the end (although I don't know what he does when he's alone), and a more-experienced pilot friend (but not in 182's) just commented that I should be flying a stabilized approach. So, what do other Skylane pilots do? I don't fly a Skylane very often, but I do fly a 180HP Arrow and a Beech Debonair on a regular basis. In the Arrow I use 1 notch of flaps when I drop the gear abeam the numbers, then 2nd notch after turning final. Prop goes full and trim for 100 MPH and adjust throttle for a 450FPM descent, keeping 2 notches of flaps all the way, milk the power out over the fence and land. I hardly ever use the 3rd notch unless its a very short field. This normally results in a well stabilized approach all the way down. In the Deb I drop the gear on downwind with approach flaps of about 15 degrees. The MP goes to 15-17" on final, prop full, trim 90 kts, and flaps don't go full until short final. With flaps full the power comes out and then flare. The approach is stabilized until the configuration change and then it's time to begin the flare. Here's a good article by John Deakin on Stabilized approaches: http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/182047-1.html |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 04:54 AM |
| VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 06:03 AM |
| Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 05:03 PM |
| Why is ADF or Radar Required on MFD ILS RWY 32 Approach Plate? | S. Ramirez | Instrument Flight Rules | 17 | April 2nd 04 12:13 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |