![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
The truth is using a small aircraft for a terrorist act would be pretty
easy, cheap and effective. The other side of that is, of course, so what? As we all know, it is easy to rent a truck, strap explosives around one's body, bring guns into a school, etc. The issue is not the delivery mechanism. As has been said often, and again recently in this forum, we are becoming a cowering nation. I have no problem acting upon real and significant threats, but I hate the insidious use of the "war on terror" to shape public policy that infringes on rights and diseminates meaningless alerts, leading to "news " articles about simple acts like busting airspace and fashion changes to airport friendly shoes... Sometimes I feel like I must have been born at the luckiest time in US history. I spent my 20's and 30's after WWII, polio, smallpox, the depression... before AIDS, overcrowded cities, and now the war on terrorism. Michael "Rosspilot" wrote in message ... http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/qnd...get=URBANG.HTM excerpt: While passenger aircraft are now pretty secure, the same is not the case for commercial freighters and private aircraft. It is quite possible that a smaller aircraft, or long range transports from foreign nations, could be used for suicide attacks. This scenario has terrorists renting a small two engine aircraft (like the Piper Aztec or Cessna Businessliner) and flying off to any target within several hundred miles. These aircraft rent for about $250 an hour (with a 3-4 hour minimum). They have a cargo capacity of about half a ton, and that could be filled with explosives. This would give the terrorists the equivalent of an American cruise missile (which has a one ton warhead.) These aircraft have a maximum take off weight of about three tons and only carry about 500 pounds of fuel. Probably would not bring down a large skyscraper, but would do a lot of damage to the White House or most other government buildings in Washington. You can buy these aircraft second hand for $200-300,000. I hate stuff like this, but I think it's better to toss it out there and shine light on it than stick my head in the sand and pretend it isn't there. www.Rosspilot.com |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... | Victor | Owning | 77 | February 22nd 04 01:02 AM |
| ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. | dlevy | Owning | 15 | January 23rd 04 05:54 PM |
| ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. | plumbus bobbus | Home Built | 0 | January 22nd 04 01:02 AM |
| ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. | plumbus bobbus | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 22nd 04 01:02 AM |
| Arming Global Hawk Draws Conflicting Comments From Pentagon | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 5 | July 14th 03 09:51 PM |