A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

comments?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10  
Old December 30th 03, 01:09 AM
Michael 182
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The truth is using a small aircraft for a terrorist act would be pretty
easy, cheap and effective. The other side of that is, of course, so what? As
we all know, it is easy to rent a truck, strap explosives around one's body,
bring guns into a school, etc. The issue is not the delivery mechanism.

As has been said often, and again recently in this forum, we are becoming a
cowering nation. I have no problem acting upon real and significant threats,
but I hate the insidious use of the "war on terror" to shape public policy
that infringes on rights and diseminates meaningless alerts, leading to
"news " articles about simple acts like busting airspace and fashion changes
to airport friendly shoes...

Sometimes I feel like I must have been born at the luckiest time in US
history. I spent my 20's and 30's after WWII, polio, smallpox, the
depression... before AIDS, overcrowded cities, and now the war on terrorism.

Michael



"Rosspilot" wrote in message
...

http://www.strategypage.com/fyeo/qnd...get=URBANG.HTM

excerpt:

While passenger aircraft are now pretty secure, the same is not the case

for
commercial freighters and private aircraft. It is quite possible that a

smaller
aircraft, or long range transports from foreign nations, could be used for
suicide attacks. This scenario has terrorists renting a small two engine
aircraft (like the Piper Aztec or Cessna Businessliner) and flying off to

any
target within several hundred miles. These aircraft rent for about $250 an

hour
(with a 3-4 hour minimum). They have a cargo capacity of about half a ton,

and
that could be filled with explosives. This would give the terrorists the
equivalent of an American cruise missile (which has a one ton warhead.)

These
aircraft have a maximum take off weight of about three tons and only carry
about 500 pounds of fuel. Probably would not bring down a large

skyscraper, but
would do a lot of damage to the White House or most other government

buildings
in Washington. You can buy these aircraft second hand for $200-300,000.


I hate stuff like this, but I think it's better to toss it out there and

shine
light on it than stick my head in the sand and pretend it isn't there.





www.Rosspilot.com




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AIRNAV not publishing fuel prices... Victor Owning 77 February 22nd 04 01:02 AM
ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. dlevy Owning 15 January 23rd 04 05:54 PM
ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. plumbus bobbus Home Built 0 January 22nd 04 01:02 AM
ALEXIS PARK INN - comments please. plumbus bobbus Instrument Flight Rules 0 January 22nd 04 01:02 AM
Arming Global Hawk Draws Conflicting Comments From Pentagon Larry Dighera Military Aviation 5 July 14th 03 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2026 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.