![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 at 22:46:28 in message
, Thomas Heide wrote: I am British and live in the UK but I have spent time in the USA. I canīt believe what I just read. Didnīt you Americans learn anything from recent history (some school-events just popped into my mind)? Irrelevant and objectionable. It just does not work to make even more people carry guns in order to protect them from potential terrorists. On what evidence do you base that statement? The Israeli's have been doing this for years. Seems to me a terrorist might well think twice if he thought there was a high chance of unknown numbers of armed law enforcement agents on board. Are all the armed police in UK major airports a waste of time then? What kind of logic is that? A reasonable hypothesis I would say. You wonīt stop terrorists from trying to hijack planes by simply having armed sky marshalls on the aircraft. Again on what do you base that wild statement? You should increase airport security first and then try to figure out how an unexperienced pilot can fly all over New York and make a sightseeing tour around the Statue of Liberty without beeing noticed at all before you think about arming sky marshalls. Nothing wrong with good security as a first line defence, but the rest of the above is just nonsense. And how impertinent are you to simply postulate a "law" like the above? I really pay my tribute to the pilots making a statement like that. I can understand they might have reservations about the powers of marshals over their own authority, but if we have them I don't want them to have to ask the captain before they act! However I do want them to be trained and to understand the risks. It plays in the same league like the major of London who explicitly allowed demonstrations against Bush in the vicinity of his whereabouts. Nothing what ever to do with it as far as I can see. The right to protest is not connected to the rights of terrorists to kill people. Without making the attacks less horrible, but America gets more and more paranoic. A few people in America may be paranoid about being criticised for not doing something but your generalisation is not justified by the American's I know that I respect and count as my friends. -- David CL Francis |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 01:47 AM |
| [OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 11:19 AM |
| [OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 09:53 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |