![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"just an average Farlang" wrote in
message news:bm9yaWtv.79091ef375f43760b097c51b2b91c89a@107 6516246.nulluser.com hmmm.... Key phrase the "public". Look up the phrase "navigable airspace" and see what it is, who owns it and who can use it. It was an example that may apply in part but the land in question is privately owned. Your example may have been arbitrary, but my request wasn't. "Navigable airspace" is federal domain and you have no claim to it - even if it is over your property. As others have stated, if your land is under the approach/departure path of an airport, planes may legally be lower than the 500' minimum that may otherwise apply - and you would have no legal recourse. Very true but what I am trying to address is where his rights on his property end and where my rights on my property begin as it applies to his plane taking off on his land and barely clearing a border fence and his plane then affecting my rights That's just it: The plane would not be affecting your rights. You're claiming some "right" to "peace and quiet" - the only thing that you've specifically claimed would be affected by this possible airport. Perhaps Idaho is different, but I am aware of no jurisdiction that provides you with a legal right to "peace and quiet". I appreicate your thoughts but I hope you realize I do not have "homeowner's associations" in outside areas. I knew that was likely the case, but it doesn't preclude you from organizing one with your neighbors, does it? I have not heard one reply in this thread commenting whether the neighbor is allowed to do such a thing as he would be flying very low over my property and below the minimum federally regulated altitude. I realize this is during a take off or landing but the fact remains with this amount of land it is not possible to take off or land without using other people's land for his runway to be possible. See Peter's response. Simply put: You're wrong. Please do not misunderstand my personal feelings and confuse that with all I am trying to present as a topic of discussion in this newsgroup. I am not asking for anyone's sympathy and I would never expect to get it in this newsgroup. Then what exactly are you hoping to achieve here? -- John T http://tknowlogy.com/TknoFlyer http://www.pocketgear.com/products_s...veloperid=4415 ____________________ |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Naval Aviation | 5 | August 21st 04 01:50 AM |
| What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixed | What's Wrong with Economics and how can it be Fixe | Military Aviation | 3 | August 21st 04 01:40 AM |
| "I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 10th 04 12:35 AM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |