A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Be A Pilot commercial



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3  
Old May 5th 04, 06:54 AM
Peter Duniho
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Circuit Breaker" wrote in message
news
[...]
What I want to know is why the History channel showed an F-15 pilot
wearing standard civilian sunglasses in the airplane during flight, yet
people who require corrective lenses can't fly the plane. At least, this
is what the recruiters have told me.


I could swear I know more than one (ex-)military aviator who wears glasses.
I am under the impression that glasses are disqualifying for entrance into
the pilot jobs, but that if your vision deteriorates later, you don't get
kicked out.

In other words, it's more likely just a way to minimize complications and
thin out the pool of applicants. After all, "everyone" wants to be a pilot,
so why should the military accept any but those "most perfect specimens of
human physiology"? Of course, once they've invested millions of dollars
training you, it'd be silly to get rid of you then, so if you need glasses
later, you get to stay.

In any case, obviously the recruiter's statement that glasses couldn't be
worn is just ridiculous. There's no obvious physical impediment to wearing
glasses in the cockpit, and even if there were, surely corrective lenses
could be built into the equipment (helmet or otherwise), or contact lenses
permitted.

Since we clearly have the technology to address vision issues in the
cockpit, I take it as granted that a restriction against corrective lenses
has something to do with other than legitimate technical issues. Arbitrary
policy-making seems the most likely explanation to me. I doubt there's any
actual good reason for it.

Pete


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 03:26 PM
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep C J Campbell Instrument Flight Rules 117 July 22nd 04 06:40 PM
definition of "dual controls" Lee Elson Instrument Flight Rules 4 April 24th 04 03:58 PM
AmeriFlight Crash C J Campbell Piloting 5 December 1st 03 03:13 PM
FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? John T Piloting 53 August 18th 03 05:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.