![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
... At the "Communicating for Safety" conference put on by NATCA in Dallas, I got the impression that there is a lot of controller sentiment in favor of changing the AIM's laissez faire approach to crossing runways enroute to the departure runway. At least since I moved up there in 2000, the controllers at PAE have always included "cross 11" when their taxi instructions require us to cross 11/29 on the way to an intersection takeoff (such as from most of the hangars to A4 on 16R/34L). However, now the thread has brought up the emphasis on "enroute to the departure runway"... does that mean a taxi instruction from the same runway intersection back to the same parking does *not* imply a clearance to cross intervening runways? That hadn't occurred to me before, and seems to compound the confusion. -- David Brooks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NASA Jet Might Have Hit Record 5,000 Mph | Garrison Hilliard | Military Aviation | 0 | March 28th 04 05:03 PM |
| Zero - specific questions | N-6 | Military Aviation | 30 | November 21st 03 03:44 AM |
| Runway Incursion and NASA form | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 12th 03 02:37 AM |
| Runway Incursion and NASA form | steve mew | Piloting | 0 | November 10th 03 06:37 AM |
| Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 08:56 PM |