![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
You DON'T need a second class to 'fly and instruct'. You can do any
instructing with a third class, or lots of instructing with no medical. Captain Wubba wrote: Hi. I recently went through a similar process, but for a medication that was neither specifically approved nor disapproved for my particular condition. I was approved, but it took 4 months. Luckily I still had time remaining on the third-class privileges of my 'old' medical...I was just waiting on my second class, so I could still fly and instruct. Here is my advice, for what it is worth. 1. Contact the AOPA, as other have suggested. They were a Godsend with me. 2. Ask your AME to refer the problem to the regional aeromedical office first, not OK City. Regional is often much faster. 3. Get a letter from your primary care physician *specifically* stating the following: a. The underlying disorder is not incapacitating, nor does it increase the liklihood of sudden incapacitation. b. That you have been asymptomatic for the underlying disorder (if true) for how long you have been. c. Thet he knows of no issues regarding either the underlying disorder or the treating medication that would make it unsafe in any way to operate a car or aircraft. d. That you suffer no side effects from the use of the medication, and have not suffered any adverse reactions in how long. e. That you have been stable on this medication for how long you have, and that it has been effective in the treatment of your disorder. f. That your physician has been treating you for however long he has been. 4. If the FAA requests any reports from specialists, contact them directly and advise them specifically of what the FAA is requesting. Approve their response before they send it. I had one specialist make this rambling complicated response that didn't address the specific requests from the aeromedical office. had I not had a chance to correct it, it may well have delayed my approval. 5. Keep copies of *everything*. 6. Read and understand FAR Part 67 well. If you recently went to the AME, you almost certainly have not been 'denied'. You have probably been deferred. The folks I talked to at the FAA aeromedical office told me the number one reason people do get denied in the end is that the FAA does not receive the information it needs. Doctors don't respond, or respond with the wrong kind of information, or applicants just give up. If the regional flight surgeon can't approve you, he'll defer you (in all liklihood) to OK City. AT this point, after a couple of weeks, the AOPA can put a 'tracker' on your file. It seems to help it move along, and they can advise you of the status and any problems that arise. The guidelines for AMEs from the FAA itself indicates that being on a non-approved medication is not automatically disqualifying. And just a hard-earned piece of advice for next time. Ask around and find out which AMEs in your area are more 'flexible' than others. Some of these guys are hardcore jackasses...mine was. Some will work with you and use common sense. Avoid the guys with a bad reputation...the guy I went to is no longer on the referral list of either of the flight schools at my airport. bad AMEs are like bad DEs...best to just ignore tham and don't use them. Eventually they'll get the message when they don't get any business. But keep at it. I talked to a lot of people, including 3 different AMEs during my process. Absent a few specific issues and medications, the FAA Aeromedical office can be pretty flexible, and seems to genuinely want to approve most applications. Good luck, Cap "pjbphd" wrote in message news:9ZPZc.193012$sh.8999@fed1read06... I'm taking flight lessons and was hoping to get my private pilot certificate not too far down the line. Today I went in for my medical and was told by the examiner I have a couple problems. Although I've been asymptomatic for some time I'm on a medication that is not allowed by the FAA. When I went to the physician who prescribed the medication (a non-pilot) he was shocked that the FAA does not allow pilots to take it. Unfortunately he does not recommend I discontinue its use. Nor is there an alternative medication acceptable to the FAA. Do I have any recourse other than discontinuing the medication even though my physician recommends I stay on it or accepting that I won't be able to fly. In other words is there any kind of appeal process provided I can get the prescribing physician to state the medication does not impair my abilities? This is particularly frustrating in that had I known the med was not allowed, starting YESTERDAY I could have gone for a recreational pilots certificate without a medical review, but now it's too late. Any help will be appreciated. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sport Pilot cuts off special issuance at the knees | Juan~--~Jimenez | Home Built | 40 | August 10th 04 02:19 PM |
| Question Medical | Captain Wubba | Piloting | 5 | June 11th 04 06:12 AM |
| RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Home Built | 78 | December 3rd 03 10:10 PM |
| RF interference issue again (esp. for E Drucker and Jim Weir and other RF wizards) | Snowbird | Owning | 77 | December 3rd 03 10:10 PM |
| Question on medical and kidney stones | nospam | Piloting | 13 | November 8th 03 08:10 AM |