![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Russell wrote in message . ..
I don't have an opinion either way on this issue because I don't have any personal knowledge (I know, that's no excuse on Usenet). I will say this, however. The language in the manual would not by itself convince me that a conventional spin recovery was impossible. The fact that the manual requires the immediately deployment of the parachute is a reflection of the fact that Cirrus did not go through the spin recovery certification process and therefore cannot recommend a conventional spin recovery technique. As far as I'm concerned the language in the manual is what it is for legal reasons and does not definitively support either side of the issue regarding the possibility of recovery. After speaking with the test pilot from Mooney I was surprised how much of the POH comes from marketing and legel and how little comes from engineering and test pilots. That's one reason cruise speeds don't seem to work out. Cruise speeds come from marketing. -Robert |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| inverted spin recovery explanation | Alan Wood | Aerobatics | 18 | August 19th 04 04:32 PM |
| Cirrus and Lancair Make Bonanza Obsolete? | Potential Bo Buyer | Owning | 211 | November 20th 03 06:29 AM |
| Cessna 150 Price Outlook | Charles Talleyrand | Owning | 80 | October 16th 03 03:18 PM |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 02:27 PM |