|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#8
October 10th 04, 04:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
"Gary Drescher" wrote in message news:tEW9d.211481$MQ5.87982@attbi_s52... What Chip's talking about is basically removing some of that discretionary power from controllers. Now, perhaps when management gets deluged with reports of 50' altitude deviations and other trivial mistakes, they'll simply start punting things too, so the "no harm, no foul" policy just gets shifted to a new desk. But in the meantime the volume of trees slaughtered will increase, and with it the hours spent on pointless paperwork for everybody. Safety will probably not benefit. Hm, I assumed that it's not a deviation if the pilot is within PTS standards; hence, being off by 50' in cruise wouldn't count. Being off by 50' in cruise wouldn't be noticed. 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 36 | October 14th 04 07:10 PM |
| Moving violation..NASA form? | Nasir | Piloting | 47 | November 5th 03 08:56 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
Threaded Mode