![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Icebound" wrote in message ... "Michael" wrote in message ups.com... Icebound wrote: ... snip... The Snowbirds safety record is certainly comparable to the Blue Angels. The Blue Angels have had one training/show death for every 14 million spectators, while the Snowbirds record is 1 for 20 million spectators. That's certainly an interesting way to asess safety. The implicit assumption here is that it's OK to have more fatalities if you draw sufficiently bigger crowds, as this will make your death/spectator ratio lower. ...snip... That was not the purpose of the comparison. The purpose of the comparison was to indicate that their safety record is similar if not better than other aerobatic teams. This made me wonder about the safety record of "private" aerobatic teams, for which little data is available. And it also made me wonder whether it was fair to compare the record of aerobatic teams with complex shows... whether private or not.... against GA statistics. As for government funding.... as I said before, governments fund many other way-less-useful projects (and not just a piddling 10 million). Here is one that not only entertains both the participants and the spectators, but generates endless good-will and visibility for the Country and the Military. Your comments on the teams are consistent with my experience. Although I realize you are discussing the Snows, let me just speak just a bit on the Thunderbirds, as I've been actively involved in their history and their mission for many years. The situation for the Snows will be unique to them of course, but the basic gut comments would be similar I'm sure. First of all......In my opinion at least, absolutely NO meaningful comparison can be made between the scenario involved in jet team formation aerobatics and any general aviation accident data base. It's like comparing apples and oranges. I wouldn't even argue this point with anyone. As for discussing the team's value to a nation; I worked closely with the Thunderbirds back in the mid seventies during the fuel crisis when the team was under close scrutiny by the military budget hounds. During that period, we looked at all the aspects of the TB involvement in the American scene. We went over hundreds of documents and reports trying to nail down a specific value for the team's worth to the nation in toto. The recruitment issue was the easiest. We had figures. It was impressive! The public relations issue was much more complicated to nail down. The Thunderbirds maintain a concept of people to people contact that they have used successfully both at home and internationally since their conception on May 29th 1953. We added up the overseas tours, the hours flown, the millions of people exposed, and finally, after discussing the issue with the powers that be in Washington, representatives of several foreign nations, and the Thunderbirds themselves, we finally discovered that the actual public relations value of the Thunderbird mission as a means of internationally reaching the hand of American friendship to the average man and woman in the street throughout the world was incalculable! I sincerely hope, and I have every reason to believe at this point anyway, that the Canadian government is smart enough to come up with the same conclusion that we did concerning the team's values, and will continue to fund the Snowbird mission. There is one factor in the Snowbird issue that we don't have here in the U.S however. The Snows, notwithstanding the incorrect assumption of one poster in this thread, do operate on a fairly tight budget as compared to our teams in the United States. The Canadian forces just don't get the funding we do down here. Since Col Philip began the Snowbird mission, the funding issue has been hard coming. The Tutors have been meticulously maintained. I know, I flew #10 myself. But they are getting old, and the team should really get the upgrade they have been seeking. I remember when our own Thunderbird team went in back in 82. The whole team at once; out at Indian Springs. The talk was that it was all over. The team would never fly again. I personally talked to Gen Creech at TAC about the team's future. There was never any doubt. The government got totally behind the mission and the team got F16's to replace the T38's. The Thunderbirds were given a LOUD vote of confidence by almost every member of the House and Senate. I sincerely hope the Canadian government does the same for the Snows. Dudley Henriques International Fighter Pilots Fellowship Commercial Pilot/CFI Retired for email; take out the trash |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|