A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Bush Prepares for Possible GPS Shutdown



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #33  
Old December 20th 04, 05:59 AM
Sully
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It would be interesting to see the differences between the one this
replaced and the current one. It was very interesting reading though
and I think this is another one of the news media's ways of creating
as much panic as possible. There has always been a policy and plan to
shut off GPS availability to keep hostile forces from using it. Yes
Clinton did shut off the degradation portion of it because there was
so much stuff available to correct for it. Even then he did reserve
the right to turn it back on whenever he wanted or it was deemed that
it was needed. Most of what I seen in this was dealing with the
possibility of the system being jammed to where it can't be used in
it's present form. Yes it did mention that it could be denied in
areas of military operations "Deny to adversaries position,
navigation, and timing services from the Global
Positioning System, its augmentations, and/or any other space-based
position,
navigation, and timing systems without unduly disrupting civil,
commercial, and
scientific uses of these services outside an area of military
operations, or for
homeland security purposes; and..." I could be wrong but I do believe
there will be a "TFR" for the military area and you probably wouldn't
want to be flying in that area any way!

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:54:09 -0500, Ron Rosenfeld
wrote:

On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:47:46 +0100, Thomas Borchert
wrote:

Ron,

Do you think AOPA's interpretation is incorrect?


I don't know. All I notice is that AOPA seems to be the only voice
interpreting it this way.


Perhaps you should read the report itself

http://www.aopa.org/whatsnew/newsite...pace_facts.pdf

and make your own interpretation, instead of relying on various news
services whose record of accuracy, with regard to aviation matters, has
been less than stellar.

You should also put the document in context with what has been going on in
the past.

I have no doubt that news services no longer just report the news. Rather
they interpret it according to their own agendas. I believe that is what
you are seeing here.


Ron (EPM) (N5843Q, Mooney M20E) (CP, ASEL, ASES, IA)


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
American nazi pond scum, version two bushite kills bushite Naval Aviation 0 December 21st 04 11:46 PM
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! [email protected] Naval Aviation 2 December 17th 04 10:45 PM
bush rules! Be Kind Military Aviation 53 February 14th 04 05:26 PM
God Honest Naval Aviation 2 July 24th 03 05:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.