![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Vaughn" wrote in message
... And I am not talking about reinforced concrete dome houses. I am talking about the real-life code-compliant housing that fills up neighborhoods here in south Florida. In fact, my post above was not even in response to you, and certainly not to some weird structure that lives in your imagination or on a on a web page somewhere. You don't know what you're talking about. Those weird structures have been built for the last 25 years throughout the world as homes, gyms, auditoriums, churches, bunkers, storage silos, airplane hangers. They can and have withstood most natural disasters including hurricanes, fire, earthquakes and tornadoes. And they're 50%-70% more energy efficient. Given similar costs why anyone would choose to build a flimsy stick and tar stylish deathtrap is beyond me. Last time I checked; here in south Florida, a code-compliant wooden house will get the same insurance rate for storm coverage as a comparable concrete home. Proper storm shutters and/or Dade approved window and door systems are a major item and insurance companies may someday force 100% retrofit in storm counties. After window protection, the next most important item for storm resistance is roof design, not the building material of the walls. Ten years ago, I toured hurricane Andrew's devastation and saw many failed structures, wood, concrete block, and yes; even reinforced concrete. And I'm sure many of them were code-compliant. That's a false sense of security. When a cat-5 hits a code compliant house it'll be in splinters. Code-compliant doesn't mean that's the best that's possible it represents somebody's idea of what can reasonably be done for the least cost given commonly used building techniques without upsetting too many people while making contractors happy. All those planes (not to mention people) that were damaged or destroyed would have been untouched in a monolithic dome. It's that simple. Vaughn (a guy who lives in a concrete house) What kind of concrete house? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hurricane Charlie and Lakeland | Orval Fairbairn | Home Built | 12 | August 17th 04 03:42 PM |