Question for Jim Weir

With the lone exception of John Smith, who has not a clue what he is talking
about, all the rest of the folks who answered gave you exactly what I would have
said.

Thanks, gang, for the help.

Jim


Ed Sullivan
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

- A member of my chapter has asked me as tech councilor what
-would be needed to assure that the installation of a Garmin 430 in his
-RV-8 would be legal in the eyes of the FAA for flying approaches. This
-falls a bit out of my area of expertise. Can you help or direct me to
-help.
-
-Ed Sullivan

Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com

That's what the guy told me when I asked about it!
Were the rules different 20 years ago?

Jim Weir wrote:
With the lone exception of John Smith, who has not a clue what he is talking
about, all the rest of the folks who answered gave you exactly what I would have
said.
Thanks, gang, for the help.
Jim

"john smith" wrote in message ...
That's what the guy told me when I asked about it!
Were the rules different 20 years ago?

No, your answer was as wrong 20 years ago as it is today.
Most likely you missed the fact that your hearsay Pitts owner has an aircraft
with a conventional airworthiness certificate rather than an experimental one.

"Ron Natalie" wrote:


"john smith" wrote in message ...
That's what the guy told me when I asked about it!
Were the rules different 20 years ago?

No, your answer was as wrong 20 years ago as it is today.
Most likely you missed the fact that your hearsay Pitts owner has an aircraft
with a conventional airworthiness certificate rather than an experimental one.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Why automatically assume this Pitts is NOT factory
built with a conventional airworthiness certificate?


Barnyard BOb --

"Ron Natalie" wrote:


"john smith" wrote in message ...
That's what the guy told me when I asked about it!
Were the rules different 20 years ago?

No, your answer was as wrong 20 years ago as it is today.
Most likely you missed the fact that your hearsay Pitts owner has an aircraft
with a conventional airworthiness certificate rather than an experimental one.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Why automatically assume this Pitts is NOT factory
built with a conventional airworthiness certificate?

Ooops.
Please disregard.


Barnyard BOb -- too early to be online