A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Feet Per Minute Conversion Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 31st 03, 05:40 AM
Gene Nygaard
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 19:13:47 +0100, Mike Lindsay
wrote:

In article , Gene Nygaard
writes
On 27 Aug 2003 20:30:05 GMT, (JJ Sinclair) wrote:

John Lee wrote.
Nowhere! However on the equator 1 second of longitude
equals 1 nautical mileWe also have 90 degrees between the equator and either pole. The

equator is always 0 degrees and the poles 90 degrees. But in between,
there are at least three different ways of measuring latitude:
geocentric latitude (the angle formed at the center of the Earth),
geodetic latitude (the one normally used, the angle formed between the
line normal to the tangent of the ellipsoid and the axis of rotation),
and the angles used in the parametric formulas representing an
ellipse. These don't agree with each other at any place not on the
equator or the poles.

Gene Nygaard
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/


Hmm, interesting...

What would the error be over, say 500km, if you used geocentric instead
of geodetic measurement?

In other words, does it matter?


If you are measuring the difference between two points, it will make
no difference whatsoever--assuming that you do the calculations
properly for the angles you are using. It's just that those two end
points will be at different latitudes, depending how you measure that
latitude.

That assumption has no guarantee of likelihood, if you are unaware
that there are different ways to measure latitude. It's sort of like
the Mars Climate Orbiter-turned-Crash-Lander. Those NASA engineers
could have converted pound force seconds to newton seconds--only
problem was, they didn't realize that they should be doing so.

Gene Nygaard
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Gene_Nygaard/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) Guy Alcala Military Aviation 3 August 13th 04 01:18 PM
Hiroshima/Nagasaki vs conventional B-17 bombing zxcv Military Aviation 55 April 4th 04 08:05 AM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 03:54 AM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 02:26 AM
got this from a friend JD Naval Aviation 7 August 31st 03 04:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.