|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
September 18th 03, 09:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Pat Russell" wrote in message
... ................ When a new rule of the second type is proposed, the response is predictable. New competitors support the rule because it removes their temptation to take new risks. ................... I would think that the "temptation to take risks" would be removed through training and judgement not one individual's interpretation of some rule. Duane 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 04:58 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |
| Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 02:13 PM |
| FAR:Safety Pilot & High Performance/Complex? | Jim | Piloting | 10 | August 13th 03 09:51 PM |
Threaded Mode