![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Motorgliders fly at permanently higher wing loadings - not fair!
Motorgliders have to make the decision to start at least 500' above or 6km before the non-mg does - not fair But having a turbo means that I can attend a comp without having to drag someone else along to sit around on an airfield whilst I enjoy myself. It means that I can go and fly midweek and know that I can get home. If motorgliding is keeping our sport alive then it's essential that we treat the pilots of motorgliders fairly. I'm not suggesting that we allow them an advantage just welcome them into the fold. Is the problem not at the door of the task setters or rules that expect task setters to attempt to get 10% of the field to land out? If the task is just too long for the day then it's not the motorgliders advantage it's to *everybodys* dissadvantage. We all get up-in-arms about safety but we all accept being put in this position. A motorglider is as likely to sustain serious damage following an engine failure over unlandable terrain as a *pure* sailplane. Surely competition tasks where the tail-end charlies finish at 120kph against the winners 150 kph are just as much of a race as those where the winners come in at 120kph and the also rans come in at 80. I'm a tail-end-charlie, I go out to have fun and I don't particularly mind coming last provided I've learnt something or at least had a good weeks flying and tested my limits. Knowing that I'd always be pushing my personal envelope I went and bought a turbo so that I could still compete ( try to get crew when you are seeded 50th in a field of 30! :-) ) I go to the comp, make up the numbers, pay the dues, enjoy the company and learn a bit every time. PS: I wonder how many current MG/Turbo pilots were crews in their early days? How many of them, like me, on some some dark, evil night in a remote field , up to their ankles in mud with the rain lashing down, the pilot asleep on the back seat of the retrieve car and a 250km drive home on unsurfaced roads, swore that they would never, given the option, subject any crew to that type of treatment? Ian "Duane Eisenbeiss" wrote in message news ![]() "JJ Sinclair" wrote in message ... There are several questions concerning motorgliders on this years SSA / SRA pilot poll. Some of the questions may have been spurred by my letter dated 7/11 03 which follows ........... None of us had enough altitude to attempt a final glide home. Two landed at the turn point, but the two motorgliders started a final glide for home over mostly unlandable terrain. They were hoping for a bump to get them home. Not getting the bump, they both started their engines a few miles from home and got distance points to the location where they started their engines. A few years back, I tried a similar final glide without sufficient altitude in my non-motorized Nimbus 3. I ended up a mile short with a broken ship. I contend this is clearly an unfair advantage. I recommend we consider returning to the rule that allowed the motorglider to have their engine available for in-flight use, but they must land to get distance points. Any in-flight use would result in zero points for the day. .............. JJ Sinclair 15-20 years ago when I was writing the rules I was probably the strongest opponent of allowing motorgliders in sanctioned contests for the very reason that you state. When the pure sailplane finds no lift over unlandable terrain there is a probable crash. The motorglider in the same situation simply starts the engine. The pure sailplane pilot most likely would not venture into such an area. That is definitely an unfair advantage. I did not think that it was proper to disable the engine because that would put the SSA in the position of suggesting pilots fly their sailplane out of certification limits. Therefore the rule was made to not allow motorgliders in sanctioned contests at that time. Over the years the rules became more liberal.until we have arrived at the current situation. I find it interesting that your comments are similar to my logic of long ago. Your suggestion of zero points for any "in-flight" engine start is the correct way to go. This allows the motorgliders to enter contests, but, still provides for a fair competition. Duane |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (PIREP, long) Cherokee 180 from Bay Area to Bishop, CA | Dave Jacobowitz | Piloting | 15 | June 24th 04 01:11 AM |
| SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Piloting | 19 | May 21st 04 04:02 PM |
| Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 06:09 AM |
| making the transition from renter to owner part 1 (long) | Journeyman | Piloting | 0 | April 13th 04 03:40 PM |
| Helicopter gun at LONG range | Tony Williams | Naval Aviation | 3 | August 20th 03 03:14 AM |