![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message ................. My action benefited the unpowered gliders by reducing congestion at the airport. And if I was able to stay out of the way, would you really begrudge me the same 25 points you got for essentially the same goal: arriving at an airport to make the end of the flight safer? Would the rule proposed be agreeable to you if it also allowed a glider to get the bonus if it landed near the airport to avoid a safety problem like I described? Eric Greenwell Richland, WA (USA) I know what you are saying. Been there, done that. At a Hobbs Nat when a squall line developed suddenly, about 26 sailplanes landed at a small single strip airport in about 20 minutes. We somehow worked it out. At a Moriairty Nats I was the last to arrive at a small airport that we found had been turned into a dump. The first 6 sailplanes were still in the little spaces that were landable (the surrounding area was unlandable). I landed in a short piece of ground near the end of the old runway and came to a stop a foot or so from a discarded refrigerator and a couple of microwave ovens. In both cases it sure would have been nice to have been able to extend an engine and have other choices. But, I did not have that choice. For the flight that you stated, what you did might have been safer, but what would you have done if you had not had an engine? If you fly in a pure sailplane contest, should you not be exposed to the same mental strain and decision making of the other contestants? There are many special disadvantages as to starting the engine as you state, but that is mostly because you elected to fly "out of class". Also, the motorgliders with an engine in the nose do not have many of those problems. Yes, I know that not many exist .... now. If the pure sailplane pilot has to make an off field landing it sometimes works out that the pilot returns very late and hungry. The motorglider pilot flys home, has a nice dinner, and gets to bed early. Is that fair? If you use the engine to modify your decision making are you competing the same as the other pilots? I am not really against what you propose, but the total concept should be thought through. I am really just asking a question about total fairness. Duane |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| (PIREP, long) Cherokee 180 from Bay Area to Bishop, CA | Dave Jacobowitz | Piloting | 15 | June 24th 04 01:11 AM |
| SWRFI Pirep.. (long) | Dave S | Piloting | 19 | May 21st 04 04:02 PM |
| Showstoppers (long, but interesting questions raised) | Anonymous Spamless | Military Aviation | 0 | April 21st 04 06:09 AM |
| making the transition from renter to owner part 1 (long) | Journeyman | Piloting | 0 | April 13th 04 03:40 PM |
| Helicopter gun at LONG range | Tony Williams | Naval Aviation | 3 | August 20th 03 03:14 AM |