![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
IMHO mid air collisions are the worry.
The closer to VNE you fly the simpler the lookout and collision avoidance issue (with respect to other gliders) becomes. Close to the ground there is less chance there is of hitting a glider in the blind spot below you. There are generally more gliders around an airfield then anywhere else. Ergo, if you want safe finishes, (including avoiding close outlandings) you want to get gliders back low and fast and look at the issue as one of flow control i.e. does everyone know where to go and what to do after the finish pull up. This is, in effect, what has been informally and safely sorted out by pilots and comp directors for decades. A close remote high finish potentially leaves a number of gliders milling around at or below normal circuit height getting in each others way and increases the collision risk. John Galloway |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Landing and T/O distances (Was Cold War ALternate Basing) | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 3 | August 13th 04 01:18 PM |
| Va and turbulent air penetration speed. | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 70 | January 11th 04 09:35 PM |
| Jet fighter top speed at military power | David L. Pulver | Military Aviation | 18 | December 1st 03 08:13 PM |
| Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 11:01 PM |
| New Film: The Need For Speed - Going to war on drugs | Phil Carpenter | Military Aviation | 0 | July 23rd 03 08:43 AM |