A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SSA petition to allow transponder to be turned off



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9  
Old February 22nd 04, 04:58 PM
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Zivley wrote:

I'm definitely in favor of gliders w/ transponders and see this as
another step towards conserving battery power for when you need it. i.e.
when you are near a high traffic airspace where the chances of crossing
paths with someone with either TCAS or ATC coverage is increased.

What about a discrete transponder code specifically for gliders??????

I understand that there is at least one area which has an agreement to
use (seems like it's 0440 or something similar) a code specifically for
gliders. Why not also work on getting this code agreed to for all of
the U.S. at the same time that they are working on the below mentioned
waiver.


Contacting your director will likely get you the latest information on
this subject, but here's what I was told last year:

-The Reno area does use 0440, and it works for them, because there are
many gliders flying there that do have transponders, and the controllers
are familiar with how a glider operate, so knowing which blip is a
glider is useful.

-The above is not true for most of the USA.

-The specific code, 0440, is used for other things around the country -
not many, but it means other changes would have to be made.

-Some have suggested making gliders easily identifiable by a specific
code might not work in our favor because controllers and others would
know "who" to be annoyed at, justified or not.

-So, the last I heard, doing a special code was likely to be on a
cas-by-case basis.

Keep up the good work!

Mark

Eric Greenwell wrote:

Check out the SSA website for the complete info on this petition, and
consider commenting to the FAA (comments due by March 1, via web site,
mail, fax, "eRulemaking portal"):

SSA Transponder Petition Published
By Dennis Wright
Posted Thursday, February 19, 2004

The SSA petition asks that SSA members be allowed to operate
transponder-equipped gliders with the transponders turned off, when
the glider is being operated more than 40 nautical miles from the
primary airport in Class B airspace and more than 20 nautical miles
from the primary airport in Class C airspace. Currently, Federal
Aviation Regulation 91.215[c] requires that all aircraft equipped with
a transponder and operating in controlled airspace have the
transponder on.

...more on the web site




--
-----
change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

Eric Greenwell
Washington State
USA

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VHF & Transponder antenna Steve Home Built 1 December 6th 04 05:29 PM
Operation without a transponder flyer Piloting 11 September 14th 04 09:48 AM
Transponder test after static system opened? Jack I Owning 6 March 14th 04 04:09 PM
Fixing the Transponder with Duct Tape and Aluminum Foil Ron Wanttaja Home Built 45 March 14th 04 01:18 AM
transponder codes Guy Elden Jr. Piloting 1 December 2nd 03 06:21 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.