![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
In the UK the recommended repack period is 6 months.
It is only a recommendation, it is not an offence to fly with a parachute which is out of repack. The problem with this sort of requirement that the rules are drawn up for the worst case scenario. A club parachute which is worn by many people all day and everyday, and is subject to a high degree of wear and tear requires regular inspection, and I would be the first to say that this is good. You do want it to work. Compare that with my parachute, lives in its bag, not thrown around, worn perhaps one or twice a week, does that require the same intensive maintenance? The rules say yes, in practice is safety compromised at all if the period between repacks is longer. Most riggers I have spoken to say no. Given the choice between sitting on a cushion which will not protect you from the impact of a crash and sitting on a serviceable chute which just happens to be a day over it's due repack I know what I would choose. At 14:30 23 February 2004, Tim Mara wrote: your answer was 100% exactly why they have made the rule...... tim 'Mark James Boyd' wrote in message news:4039b164$1@darkstar... In article , Tim Mara wrote: now, I am not going to try to justify the cycle period, and in fact this can vary from country to country, and even most manufacturers will probably say the 120 day cycle is too frequent for our typical use, but I can understand the FAA rule on this, and anyone who doesn't see the reasoning is why they have the rule... plain and simple, if it were legal to wear an out of date parachute, would you, or anyone else bother to have it inspected or repacked?? I rather doubt it....in fact you're already suggested you wouldn't... There's no rule requiring me to change my tidy-whities every week either, but I DO IT! :P For health reasons, you know... Same for a chute. I wouldn't just sit on the thing for 12 years and drip jelly on it and drag it through the dirt all day and think it would open. But if it's my own G*****n chute in a G*****n single-seat glider, whose business is it anyway? Rules are never a simple matter or what's right for the masses, but made because some one or a few people have done something that was questionable, or wrong. If we were all perfect, and always right we'd have far fewer rules, regulations and restrictions.... tim A coupla guys weighing in heavy on an expired reserve on a tandem skydiving jump is a hell of a long way from me in my itsy-bitsy glider wearing an emergency chute I don't even intend to use. Who'll convince me that the extra safety of having the more frequent repack outweighs the lack of safety when I fly twice without the chute each year (while I wait for the packer to send it back)? |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VHF & Transponder antenna | Steve | Home Built | 1 | December 6th 04 05:29 PM |
| Operation without a transponder | flyer | Piloting | 11 | September 14th 04 09:48 AM |
| Transponder test after static system opened? | Jack I | Owning | 6 | March 14th 04 04:09 PM |
| Fixing the Transponder with Duct Tape and Aluminum Foil | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 45 | March 14th 04 01:18 AM |
| transponder codes | Guy Elden Jr. | Piloting | 1 | December 2nd 03 06:21 PM |