![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Bill Daniels
writes OK, I guess this is a top post thread. It ain't horsepower, it's the PROP. To improve the 0 - 20 acceleration, improve the propeller. Have you ever tried to figure out how much power actually gets to the tow hook on the glider from a 260 HP Pawnee? Maybe 20 HP? At low speeds, as at the beginning of the TO roll, the tug's prop is mostly stalled and converting little of the engines HP to thrust. As it accelerates, more of the prop disc becomes unstalled and the prop picks up efficiency and therefore more acceleration. A headwind helps a lot here. So, what to do? 1. A constant speed prop reduces the blade AOA and lets the engine rev to its redline RPM. (Noisy) 2. Big, slow turning props make much more thrust at low speeds than small, high RPM props. (Quieter but require PRSU gearbox) 3. Ducted fans work really well at low speeds but lose out to a standard prop at 100 MPH +. (A LOT quieter) The ducted fan looks very good in that it can turn at crankshaft RPM while producing several times the thrust of an unshrouded prop at zero airspeed. So, why don't you folks living in a country blessed with friendly regulators design and build a certified ducted fan tug using the minimum engine necessary - say a 140 HP LOM M132CE. (Less fuel, less noise). See: http://www.moraviation.com/ I imagine an airframe that looks somewhat like an Ogar. A cute trick would be to make the fan and duct as one rotating unit constructed of carbon fiber - this eliminates the problem of fan tip-duct clearance. Bill Daniels Something like that was developed here in the UK a few years ago. It was a place STOL with a ducted fan and it could fly very slowly. It was called the Optima and it was designed by a Mr Edgerly, who also designed a sailplane, using unconventional materials. Several examples were completed, more were under construction, but were destroyed in a fire. And isn't nitrous oxide N2O, not NO2 which is nitrogen dioxide? -- Mike Lindsay |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| Aviation crash videos on-line | Dudley Henriques | Piloting | 113 | September 12th 04 09:54 PM |
| The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 04:58 PM |
| SSA to Safety Group at Convention: "Clear Off!" ? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 11 | February 13th 04 05:48 PM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |