![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
DrJack wrote
So I found it interesting that in a recent poll of BLIPMAP users, of the 430 respondents who listed themselves as a "Sailplane" pilot the percentage who also said they were SSA members was _91%_. I think the main selection bias you are missing is the low participation of power pilots. Less than 30% of the respondents were power rated at all; given my experience with active soaring pilots who are also power rated, I would guess that means that only about 10-20% of the respondents are active in power flying. Further, I think of the soaring pilots not represented by SSA, the majority are primarily power pilots with limited soaring interest. After all, if you're going to get badges, enter constests, or be in a club, you generally have to join SSA. there would have to be a huge opposing bias in the non-participating pilots to get down to a 50% overall SSA-member level. Actually, I think the real selection bias is being a BLIPMAP member in the first place. I never even heard of it until now, and I'm primarily a power pilot and occasional soaring pilot who is not an SSA member. FWIW, my conclusion is that the number of _active_ soaring pilots who are also SSA members is much greater than 50% Almost certainly, especially if by 'active' you mean those who soar most weekends. An active power pilot is going to have other interests (mainly power flying) and is unlikely to soar as much as someone whose only flying is soaring. so the pool of non-SSA soaring pilots which might be used to increase SSA membership is not nearly so large as Roake's statement would suggest. Actually, I suspect that those soaring pilots who are not SSA members are mostly not available to increase SSA membership at all. Someone whose primary interest is flying, and who considers soaring to be just one aspect of it (and not the most important one at that) is much more likely to give his money to AOPA or EAA. My experience is that there are lots of inactive and sporadic soaring pilots out there who are active in other kinds of flying. Some just got the rating with no intent of ever using it (should they be called gliding rather than soaring pilots?) but many others actually have some XC experience, and don't soar much (or at all) because soaring is so inconvenient compared to powered flying. Good luck trying to convince those people that they should send money to SSA. Michael |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Piloting | 114 | July 22nd 04 06:40 PM |
| Seeking anecdotes about "instructor in command" | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 22 | July 8th 04 03:40 PM |
| Student as PIC in IMC? | Geo. Anderson | Instrument Flight Rules | 40 | May 29th 04 06:09 PM |