![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"JJ Sinclair" wrote in message ... Ever ask yourself, why doesn't our safety record improve? We seem to have the same type and about the same number of accidents every year. Lets take the *controls not hooked up*, its about time for another one of those. Every year a couple of guys will try to fly without hooking up a control. This type accident is 100% preventable. Why can't we put a stop to it? The answer is simple, we don't have the power to control it. The airlines wouldn't put up with it. The military would have no problem in eliminating it. Clubs have the power to stop it. How about the individual sailplane owner? We got the power to control his/her actions? No we don't and just try and get a little muscle and listen to the screams. I tried to get the *wing tape sign off* adopted by asking my local FBO's to refuse to give a tow unless the tow pilot saw a wing tape sign off on each sailplane wing. I got ZERO replies from the 5 FBO's I asked to try the plan and several of them had experienced accidents caused by controls not hooked up. Our safety record will not improve because we don't have the power to enforce rules designed to make soaring safer. JJ Sinclair I'm convinced that safety can't be found in stricter rules or inspections. The very nature of flight is that it takes place beyond the reach of these. Safety is in the attitude and skillset of the individual pilot. Danger lies between the ears of the pilot, not in the hardware or rulebook. This is a classic cautionary tale of misdirected concern. When I was a student pilot long ago, you would see pilots shaking the wingtips of their wooden gliders up and down at the resonant frequency of the wing while staring at the sweep second hand of their wris****ches. The idea was that the natural frequency would change if the strength of the wing deteriorated. They were REALLY worried about old wood wings. One day a wing failed and two died. The FAA and NTSB took the separated wing to a lab and measured its strength. They found it had failed at 14 G's. The pilot and his passenger didn't die from a defective wing, they died of terminal stupidity. The pilot simply overloaded a perfectly good wing while attempting aerobatics. I'll bet right up to the point the wing broke he was sure he was safe because he was a wing shaker. The next time you fly, take a second to look at the hand holding the stick. Life and death is right there. Move it a couple of inches the wrong way and you die. If you find that thought uncomfortable, find a good instructor to fly with. Bill Daniels |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parachute fails to save SR-22 | Capt.Doug | Piloting | 72 | February 10th 05 06:14 AM |
| Army National Guard celebrates flight safety record | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | June 19th 04 10:16 PM |
| What is the safety record of the F-102? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 1 | February 22nd 04 05:41 AM |
| LaPorte honors helicopter unit for four-year safety record | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | January 15th 04 12:03 AM |
| USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 04:17 PM |