![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pete Reinhart wrote:
Well now, It seems to me that if you are truly an excellent instuctor, it shouldn't make a lot of difference what you're flying to teach in. If you were a truly excellent instructor, you would realize how much the trainer affects what you can teach. The other problem, of course, is most of us aren't truly excellent instructors, just as most of us aren't truly excellent pilots. So, we have things like automatically connecting controls to make it easier for us to do the right thing. I've flown in 2-33s and instructed in Blaniks, and I know a 2-33 would make it much harder for me to prepare a student for the glider I hope he/she will purchase for post-licence flying. I don't care how good you are as an instructor, you are still limited by the student's ablity to learn (in general) and what you can demonstrate in particular (glider limitations). That is, if you are teaching people to fly rather than just operate a perticular kind of aircraft. There is something to learn from every flight no matter what it is in. I am not comfortable in the back seat of a 2-33 anymore and I hven't taught in many years, but I admire the 2-33 greatly for what it is and what it does. I've not done any x-c in one but I know people who have and it's true that they are a pain to de rig in an off field landing but so what. "So what" is big problem. A hard to derig and retrieve glider really discourages a student from even contemplating cross-country unless he can be sure of landing at airports for an aero retrieve, and the low performance means it is impractical to stay within reach of airports. Practically speaking, it means most students won't take a 2-33 away from the home airport. They do the job they were designed for admirably IMHO. I agree, but the job requirements have changed in the 40 years since they were designed. It is not a criticism of the Schwiezers to say their 40 year old design is no longer the best choice! As for retarding the sport, how many glider pilots would there be now if it weren't for the ready availibility of a functional 2-33? We have two of them in our club and they are rarely unflyable: our Twin Astir has been down for maintenance over six months in the preceding year, and it's not a delicate machine. "Course I'm not selling anything and I don't have the opinion that only a european glider is worthy of my effort to fly it. I don't have anything to sell and I don't have the opinion that only a European glider is worthy of my effort to fly it, but I still echo Robert's comments. Please stick with responding to what a person says instead of disparaging motives you can only speculate about. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell Washington State USA |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 11:33 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | June 2nd 04 08:17 AM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | May 1st 04 08:29 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 04:04 PM |
| Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 05:50 PM |