![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob Chilcoat asks;
My interest is the word "unporting". It doesn't sound right. I'm an engineer (biomedical), but not an aeronautical engineer. You aerospace engineers out there, is this the right term? I am an aeronautical engineer, and I've never heard that term other than in reference to fuel lines. Sounds to me like a load of hooey. ...Gann was not mechanical, and I was wondering if he got the term wrong. Sure sounds like it. "Unporting is the balance destruction of the elevators by aerodynamic force. I won't confuse you with theory, but if enough separation between the fixed and the balance portion of your elevators occurs..... This sounds like a very poor laymans interpretation of moving surface flutter. If a bolt was missing, then the surface (in this case, the elevator, apparently) could have more motion and less stiffness than it was designed for, and this could allow the flutter to begin at lower frequencies (speeds) than it normally would. But "unporting"??? ..... But if you had been the nervous type, if you slowed down, the center of gravity would have changed. The fact that someone thinks that the CG changes substantially with a change in speed indicates a poor understanding of both aerodynamics and terminology. People wandering around inside the plane to go to the bathroom will change the CG more than a couple of degree change in AOA. ..... As soon as the time came for a normal power reduction and it was accomplished, unporting would begin. But not you. In the past you had lost all four engines so many times, the prospect of losing one gave you relatively little concern. So you sat there, fat, dumb, and happy, and you cancelled all power reductions. This brilliant decision saved your life the first time that day." And what happened when the plane came in to land - it didn't slow down? They landed at cruising speed? The air density stayed the same at all altitudes that day? No change in aerodynamic inputs as the plane went from cruise to landing configuration? ..... We had some long sessions with our slide rules and we found, my friend, that you had arranged the only possible combination of power, speed and weight which would blockade the chances of unporting." And if this could possibly be true, at all combinations of climb speeds and altitudes, cruise speed and altitude, and descent/approach speeds and altitudes, then the phrase "only possible combination" has very little meaning. If this passage is indicative of Mr. Gann's knowledge of aircraft, then I'm glad that I never read the book. -- Marc J. Zeitlin http://marc.zeitlin.home.comcast.net/ http://www.cozybuilders.org/ Copyright (c) 2004 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pinging Tommy Cooper | Bob Chilcoat | Home Built | 0 | September 30th 03 09:28 PM |
| KitPlanes - Home Page by Ron Wanttaja | RobertR237 | Home Built | 40 | August 12th 03 11:17 PM |